Am 24.11.2008 um 19:40 schrieb Dave Cridland:
For the crypto layer, any TLS library. These include OpenSSL, GNU TLS, as well as numerous others.
Aha, so no client implementing C2C TLS at all, I see.
For the C2C TLS protocol itself, this is just <starttls/> over a C2C XMPP session - are you saying that Gajim won't use TLS on a link local session if offered? If not, why not? If so, why does this not count?
Aha, so you count it as an implementation if there is no negotiaion etc? Interesting! You count having nothing as having a full implementation. Indeed, really interesting!
You know the answers to the remainder of your questions, or else can look them up in the archives.
So nothing changed, all is still like it was before, like I predicted half a year before? So C2C TLS is dead before it was ever used - no client going to implement it properly etc? Now please tell me how having nothing is better than ESessions. You already admitted that there's currently nothing.
-- Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
