2009/1/23 Pedro Melo <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Jan 22, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: > >> 2009/1/22 Matthew Wild <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I must say I'm inclined to agree with Olivier. Perhaps we are solving >>> the problem from the wrong angle? Specifically, perhaps we can solve >>> the need for users to append "(Home)", "(Work)", "(ICQ)" and "(MSN)"? >>> >>> I'm not going to object to this XEP, I just can't help wondering if >>> the same could be achieved in a simpler way. >>> >>> Matthew. >>> >> >> Custom contact tagging? I smell a new XEP... :D > > Really, if this is something that is going to be discussed, then you should > just allow for extra XML namespaces under each <item> in the roster. That, > with the incremental roster XEPs discussed (resulted in XEP-0237, Data > Sequencing) is probably the best answer for anything contact related. > > Best regards, > -- > Pedro Melo > Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/ > XMPP ID: [email protected] > Use XMPP! > > >
That would be just another way of storing data. If some servers don't support classic XML storage, how soon would they support this?
