Another thing to clarify - how to handle groups? That is.. Union? Intersection? Should client synchronize them when "merging" contacts? Etc.. I think that best approach would be union and synchronizing between all sub-contacts.
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metac... Remko Tronçon
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (M... Jiří Zárevúcký
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-02... Yann Leboulanger
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Jiří Zárevúcký
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Yann Leboulanger
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Pedro Melo
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metacontacts) Olivier Goffart
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metacontacts) Jonathan Schleifer
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metaconta... Jiří Zárevúcký
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metaconta... Remko Tronçon
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metac... Jiří Zárevúcký
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (M... Yann Leboulanger
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-02... Jonathan Schleifer
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Kevin Smith
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Jonathan Schleifer
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Yann Leboulanger
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metac... Matthew Wild
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (M... Jiří Zárevúcký
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-02... Pedro Melo
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Jiří Zárevúcký
- Re: [Standards] DEFERRED: XE... Pedro Melo
