Fabio Forno wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I think this would be a good revision to include in rfc3921bis. See my >> post on the xmppwg list just now: >> >> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/xmppwg/2009-February/002507.html > > For me it's fine, also because other possible large item sets are > better handled by xep-59, which is more suitable for "browsing" > (disco#items included, but for pubsub nodes)
Yes, I think that other mechanisms might be more appropriate for disco. Also in rosters we have the push mechanism to send the "diff", which we don't have in disco. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
