On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > Curtis King wrote: >> >> On 19-Feb-09, at 1:45 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>> I don't think the bandwidth difference is that big here, but I like the >>> idea of putting it in rfc3921bis so that more people implement it. ;-) >> >> +1 >> >> Funny, I'm adding basic support for this right now. > > Super. I'll update XEP-0237 again so that it's closer to what was in > version 0.3. :) >
Looks like I need to update my implementation :) I'm not really bothered by the format of the request. However I wouldn't myself have recommended for it to go into the RFCs, preferring to keep the core protocols as simple as possible. However this is just my personal opinion, I have no technical reasons to back it up :) That said, where does the stuff we discussed at the summit about fetching only particular roster groups for a session come in now? This is something I could see going into the RFCs, tying in a lot more closely with existing roster semantics. Matthew.
