2009/4/14 Nicolas Vérité <[email protected]>: > 2009/4/14 Jiří Zárevúcký <[email protected]>: >> 2009/4/14 Nicolas Vérité <[email protected]>: >>> In 3rd bullet point of section 4, >>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0224.html#rules imho, a user could well >>> receive a delayed 'attention', though I propose the change from MUST >>> to SHOULD. >> >> That's nonsense. When user receives your delayed attention request, >> you could very well be in work, school, with girlfriend, etc by then. >> Attention is a way to get him to talk to you immediately. > > Not so nonsense: I wish I had the passed attention requests when I get > back to my client... > It is a worthwhile information, even if it's too late. That way, I > could contact back the guy that tried to get my attention. >
You won't generally try an "attention" to someone you haven't send several classic messages already and didn't get response... That would be considered rude and maybe even spamming.
