On 4/14/09 3:44 AM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: > 2009/4/14 Nicolas Vérité <[email protected]>: >> 2009/4/14 Jiří Zárevúcký <[email protected]>: >>> 2009/4/14 Nicolas Vérité <[email protected]>: >>>> In 3rd bullet point of section 4, >>>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0224.html#rules imho, a user could well >>>> receive a delayed 'attention', though I propose the change from MUST >>>> to SHOULD. >>> That's nonsense. When user receives your delayed attention request, >>> you could very well be in work, school, with girlfriend, etc by then. >>> Attention is a way to get him to talk to you immediately. >> Not so nonsense: I wish I had the passed attention requests when I get >> back to my client... >> It is a worthwhile information, even if it's too late. That way, I >> could contact back the guy that tried to get my attention. >> > > You won't generally try an "attention" to someone you haven't send > several classic messages already and didn't get response... That would > be considered rude and maybe even spamming.
Right. Let's not propose technical solutions to social problems. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
