Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > In the XMPP Council meeting yesterday, we discussed the desirability of > adding some implementation notes to XEP-0199 (XMPP Ping) before > advancing it from Draft to Final.
Stupid question: why use XEP-0199 and not <r/> <a h='0'/> from XEP-0189 for this task? > "Some XMPP clients do not respond to IQ stanzas containing unsupported > payloads. Although this is in violation of XMPP Core, this behavior can > result in disconnection of clients that are in fact actively connected > to the server." Maybe this is a good thing to force developers to update the client. Dirk -- "I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it."
