-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/29/09 8:08 AM, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > 2009/5/29 Justin Karneges <[email protected]>: >> But yes, the advantage of XEP-199 is that it works with clients that may not >> actually support XEP-199. :) For clients that aren't XMPP-compliant enough >> to return errors from unsupported iq types, the server could use a heuristic >> approach to detect such clients and then not ping them. >> > > I don't think such clients deserve any special treatment. It will just > make things complicated for everyone else. There is the RFC, nobody > will ever force me to specially handle non-standard behavior because > someone is lazy.
Agreed. Let's not coddle software that doesn't even bother to comply with the most basic semantics of IQ stanzas. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkof7ToACgkQNL8k5A2w/vz+aACg7ofOm2dZR2raf3QGLlg73WN9 rREAn3/z5MAECtAMdLI6zYmeiky/7E5O =0wvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
