-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/14/09 1:15 PM, Curtis King wrote:
> 
> On 14-Jul-09, at 8:13 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 7/14/09 12:11 AM, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
>>> On wto, 2009-07-14 at 04:40 +0200, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
>>>> I agree specs should be strict, but someone not capable of deducing
>>>> this actually implementing the spec? That is a ridiculous idea
>>>> (considering all the examples).
>>>
>>> I've seen XMPP implemented by "XML console deduction", so I am expecting
>>> the worse.
>>
>> True. :)
>>
>> I shall add an example about this when I copy over the roster versioning
>> stuff to 3921bis.
> 
> Can a server always include ver attribute in all roster pushes, even
> when it hasn't been enabled by a client? The XEP only states, "When
> roster versioning is enabled, the server MUST include the updated roster
> version with each roster push. Roster pushes MUST occur in order of
> modification and the version contained in a roster push MUST be unique."
> It should be clear in the draft.

Agreed -- there is no harm if the server always includes 'ver'. I'll
update the spec to say that.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpc2sgACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxWPACePB7KXKtOmJqMbBi0JFlLzExg
RPYAnjB0uHfNtLavWbDvslrg4R29/eO9
=b8oT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to