-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/14/09 2:25 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Tue Jul 14 20:21:44 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Agreed -- there is no harm if the server always includes 'ver'. I'll >> update the spec to say that. > > Interesting - when Curtis and I chatted privately about this issue, I > assumed that the opposite would apply - that is, a XEP-0237 server > wouldn't send out ver unless it'd been asked for the initial roster get > with a ver.
Is there harm in sending 'ver'? Will clients break? Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpc6ucACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwD0gCfb3gQhMHxeVW+JcqYEPEYl9PG K+AAoNYYh8TgD2IVk7NLczqm1q3g5cen =TB3K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
