-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/15/09 8:44 AM, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
> The only objectively
> "broken" thing is probably just the fact you can't be sure about the
> existence of incoming subscription request (if declined by a different
> resource, you have no idea it happened).
> 
> Subjectively, roster (and subscription handling as a whole) was the
> single most annoying thing I've implemented so far, including MUC,
> data forms, file-transfer, etc. It's my subjective personal opinion,
> though, so you can freely ignore it.

I never said that the roster+presence functionality is beautiful,
simple, or easy to implement -- only that it has worked for 10 years, so
I think we need to be very careful about designing something new and
backward-incompatible at this stage.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpd7A0ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyDnQCg5paRybVDEmKyxjHG4shBksQU
sQMAnRLSgM8f7gfxfBbVyFFJkYaODFsf
=aJCZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to