Hi,
On 2009/07/23, at 23:29, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
Version 0.4 of XEP-0258 (Security Labels in XMPP) has been released.
Abstract: This document describes the use of security labels in
XMPP. The document
specifies how security label metadata is carried in XMPP, when
this metadata
should or should not be provided, and how the metadata is to be
processed.
Changelog: Update label catalogs to include user input selector. (kdz)
Diff:
http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0258.xml?r1=2911&r2=3336
URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0258.html
Section 3:
"The <label/> and <equivalentlabel/> elements each require a type=
attribute."
The examples lack the `type` attribute though.
Section 4:
the definition of the <label> in the catalog shows something like
this: <label>"|"]*<label>
It doesn't seem right nor consistent with the text that follows. Maybe
there was an escaping problem?
In example 8, the 'to' attribute is misplaced, should be in the top
level <iq> stanza. Also present in example 9, maybe it should be a
from there?
Section 5:
"Otherwise, the clearance input is the nil clearance. The nil
clearance is a clearance for which the ACDF always returns Deny when
given as the clearance input"
Isn't this mandating policy trough a XEP? Shouldn't this be left to
each particular installation? I could decide to allow 'nil' clearance
if the current message label is unclassified or missing.
The same situation in the next paragraph: "The nil label is a label
for which the ACDF always returns Deny when given as the label input".
Best regards,
