> Why is this? Should it be there? (For what it's worth, I'm not even sure it > *can* be there - XEP-0030 can't change <iq/> semantics).
Odd indeed. I agree that it shouldn't be there. Maybe it's a historical leftover? cheers, Remko
- [Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute required? Dave Cridland
- Re: [Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute required? Remko Tronçon
- Re: [Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute require... Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute required? Klaus Hartke
- Re: [Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute require... Dave Cridland
