-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 8/19/09 3:58 AM, Remko Tronçon wrote: >> Why is this? Should it be there? (For what it's worth, I'm not even sure it >> *can* be there - XEP-0030 can't change <iq/> semantics). > > Odd indeed. I agree that it shouldn't be there. Maybe it's a > historical leftover?
I think so. Will fix. Certainly you could send a disco request to your bare JID implicitly by not including a 'to'. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqS2icACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwigACgmoqHCntkoi4S9AyinF/Nudjb CKMAoM69yOf4qc/LeqtTfzVgy0S5Szyg =ZbOP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
