On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm curious what you mean by "already now it is very difficult to be > updated about any aspect of XEPs". Part of the problem is that we've > mostly had one spec author, and that introduces bottlenecks. But that > situation has changed a bit over the last 12 months and I think it will > get better over time because more people are helping with the writing > and maintenance of XEPs. Well, reviewing doesn't require as much time as editing XEPs, but the possible topics are so many that I don't think that present and future council can handle more without losing detail ()with all the risks) or delegating decisions. > Also, we essentially have one "working group", which is this list. I > have started other lists as informal special interest groups (for > PubSub, Jingle, MUC, etc.). Some of those are more active than others, > but overall I think that it has been productive to offload some of the > discussions from this list to special-purpose lists. > > I agree that we have some scalability challenges, but overall I don't > think they are too serious. Yet. :) About this I'm more pessimistic, since I'm optimistic (e.g. when people really understand wave - I've still do 100% myself indeed ;) - we'll see floods here) bye -- Fabio Forno, Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [email protected]
