-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/23/09 3:14 PM, Fabio Forno wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm curious what you mean by "already now it is very difficult to be >> updated about any aspect of XEPs". Part of the problem is that we've >> mostly had one spec author, and that introduces bottlenecks. But that >> situation has changed a bit over the last 12 months and I think it will >> get better over time because more people are helping with the writing >> and maintenance of XEPs. > > Well, reviewing doesn't require as much time as editing XEPs, but the > possible topics are so many that I don't think that present and future > council can handle more without losing detail ()with all the risks) or > delegating decisions.
Eventually we might need to add a tier between the spec authors and the Council, as is done in the IETF where the IESG (like the Council) is the final authority but the efforts are divided into working groups. But I don't yet see the need for that. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq6kQUACgkQNL8k5A2w/vy1PgCgw30es2W3JS7jGssegV/jILEA 9wUAoLiPZ3v35m3fW1siiAzsRDXzEpYM =JfSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
