Hello Peter, On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:46:18 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's a lot of changes. Can we allow the changes in 1.1 to settle for a > while before we make further edits? Are the modifications you propose > spec errata, protocol optimizations, niceties instead of necessities, > solutions to security problems, etc.? I believe that "a" (server push in "itemremove") is spec errata, "d" (end points in range commands) might be spec text clarification (not sure where it belongs in your list ;-), while all other changes are more like "protocol/usage case optimizations". You (or smb else) might want to disagree with my classification, though (in fact, even with the whole idea of these changes being necessary) - to hear others opinions on the issues mentioned is why I put it on the list in the first place: maybe nobody else sees these issues as issues at all ... -- Good luck! Alexander
