-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/30/09 12:15 PM, Alexander Tsvyashchenko wrote: > Peter, > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:29:36 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well, see, the Council has already approved version 1.1 of the spec >> (other than Ralph, who has until the end of the day to vote). So if we >> make more changes, the Council will need to issue a second Last Call and >> then the new Council will approve the changes, which means we'll need to >> wait at least a month. I'd rather push out 1.1 because it has good >> fixes, then complete further revisions that will be published in 1.2. > > I completely agree with this approach - it's not that these changes are > urgent/critical for 1.1, they can easily wait for next version. > > I just wanted to share my concerns about issues I've noticed to get others > opinions on that - but looks like I've timed my letter wrongly, causing > unnecessary confusion ...
No problem. :) Let's revisit this again in a few week -- feel free to ping me via IM to discuss your patch. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrDoygACgkQNL8k5A2w/vx+PwCgsIxDF29HG0mxe4OMLJ7xOOHJ ZlQAoIq3jlpcLbEkQGdhERnvfYsGv+R7 =fuQX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
