Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Joe Hildebrand <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/18/10 8:44 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> * To have "acks" without implement XEP-0184 Message Receipts or similar >>> What do you do if you don't receive the ack? Resend? >> >> IQs MUST be acked or errored according RFC 3920. Bad client, bad! >> >> Now the ack or error might be lost. Again, there are no guarantees here. >> But it's more likely that the subscriber supports 3920 semantics for IQs >> than that it supports XEP-0184. > > There are a myriad of ways the original IQ or the ack could get lost. My > point is that the response does not serve any value to the sender, since I > don't believe there is anything useful to be done when the sender does not > receive the ack. Resending is almost always going to be wrong.
Why? I think the exact opposite is true. We have item ID's so we can ignore duplicates. Bye, -- Pedro Melo http://www.simplicidade.org/ xmpp:[email protected] mailto:[email protected]
