On 2/19/10 12:47 AM, "Evgeniy Khramtsov" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Pedro Melo wrote: >>> There are a myriad of ways the original IQ or the ack could get lost. My >>> point is that the response does not serve any value to the sender, since I >>> don't believe there is anything useful to be done when the sender does not >>> receive the ack. Resending is almost always going to be wrong. >>> >> >> Why? I think the exact opposite is true. We have item ID's so we can >> ignore duplicates. So you retry, and don't get a response. What now? Retry? Let me ask a different question. What are you going to do if you get a response? > I guess because if a sender doesn't receive the response, this doesn't > mean a receiver doesn't receive the request. Yes, although Pedro has a point that the id's allow you to discard duplicates. -- Joe Hildebrand
