On 2/19/10 3:05 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> If I understand your comment correctly, I would change the text as follows:
>>
> 
> fine, just a doubt about SHOULD or MAY temporarily suspend...  I'm not
> sure it is the general desired behavior, but just for some
> applications like long living bytestreams. What happens in other cases
> when a file jingle transfer fails while going on? I think the general
> case is re-negotiating the jingle session and send the remaining part
> of the file.

Isn't that handled at a layer above XEP-0047?

> I'd suggest to retry in case of timeout in the IQ too (if we have an
> already established ibb, resending the IQ for a while is the sane
> thing imho).

Agreed.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to