Ciao Fabio! :) On 2/28/10 4:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 2/19/10 3:05 AM, Fabio Forno wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> If I understand your comment correctly, I would change the text as follows: >>> >> >> fine, just a doubt about SHOULD or MAY temporarily suspend... I'm not >> sure it is the general desired behavior, but just for some >> applications like long living bytestreams. What happens in other cases >> when a file jingle transfer fails while going on? I think the general >> case is re-negotiating the jingle session and send the remaining part >> of the file. > > Isn't that handled at a layer above XEP-0047? > >> I'd suggest to retry in case of timeout in the IQ too (if we have an >> already established ibb, resending the IQ for a while is the sane >> thing imho). > > Agreed.
I've tried to clarify these matters (and the block size issues) in version 1.3rc2: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0047/diff/1.3rc1/vs/1.3rc2 Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
