On 2010-10-06 07:27, Matthew Wild wrote: > Personally I think having 100 mark only non-anonymous makes most > sense.
+1 to everything Matthew said. ~Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Standards] Status code 100 in MUC Kevin Smith
- Re: [Standards] Status code 100 in MUC Matthew Wild
- Re: [Standards] Status code 100 in MUC Paul Aurich
- Re: [Standards] Status code 100 in MUC Florent Le Coz
- Re: [Standards] Status code 100 in MUC Kevin Smith
- Re: [Standards] Status code 100 in MUC Peter Saint-Andre
