On 06/10/10 16:27, Matthew Wild wrote:
Personally I think having 100 mark only non-anonymous makes most
sense. I think it's given that when you join a room the admins will be
able to see your JID, there's really no such thing as
"fully-anonymous", and I've never seen that functionality used. Based
on that we'd be including 100 with practically every MUC join for
little reason.
That's also how I did understand that. If it's how it is meant, I think
this should be clarified in the first paragraph quoted by Kevin Smith.
Florent
