2011/3/25 Remko Tronçon <[email protected]>: >> Only the latest message seems overly restrictive (especially if the last >> message you send it "oops"). I'd say a buffer of, say, the last 5 >> messages might be appropriate. > > For the same reason, I think that only one edit is overly restrictive. > I have needed several edits to get a one-sentence IM message right :-) > > I don't see a reason to put in arbitrary restrictions in the protocol > (different use cases can warrant different limits); i wouldn't mind > recommendations, though. > > As long as the client indicates that a message has been edited X times > (and provides the original message), i don't really see any issues.
Well, the Standards ML and the Council can do what it wants of the implementor and user feedback... Who else has implemented a correction feature? What user have said about it? Don't forget that we are in the proces of allowing to modify (a) past message(s)... it is a huge trickery concern. Also, what do you want to do with encrypted messages? -- Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:[email protected] Jabber ID : xmpp:[email protected]
