On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 16:30, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Nicolas Vérité > For only one edit, I'm not sure this is necessary for interop (and > therefore to include in the spec) - but clients are free to not render > an edit as an edit if they feel they don't want to for some reason.
Drrring. Wrong. This is a strong user demand, maybe the strongest. It is mandatory to clearly state an edit as an edit. Or show the original along with the corrected (strike formatting, or whatever, if you want). -- Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:[email protected] Jabber ID : xmpp:[email protected]
