And Matthew Wild spoke on 04/28/2011 06:19 AM, saying: > On 28 April 2011 14:13, Yann Leboulanger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Le 28/04/2011 10:31, Dave Cridland a écrit : >>> Or there's XEP-0191. >>> >>> What prevents people using that? I know you can't do invisibility >>> through it, but there's always XEP-0186 for that. Otherwise it seems >>> vastly simpler and a much clearer specification, too.
+1 >> Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and prosody >> don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers. >> > > http://code.google.com/p/prosody-modules/wiki/mod_blocking > > It's waiting for client support, testing, and feedback before we can > include it in a release. Pidgin has supported this for a while now (a bit over two years). I've tested it with jabberd2's implementation. > Regards, > Matthew ~Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
