Hi folks, I notice in XEP-0060 (as well as XEP-0277 and other places) that when Atom is used with pubsub, the internal id of the entry never matches the id of the item that contains it.
Is there a reason to do this on purpose? The main reason I can think of is if you didn't trust the Atom ids to be unique, for example when aggregating. However, this mismatching complicates other use cases, like if you want to update an existing entry. You'd need to use the pubsub id and not the Atom id. Maybe I miss the point, but I think XEP-0277 should require item ids and atom ids to match, unless someone can explain why this is not a good idea. Thanks, Justin
