On 05/09/2011 01:08 PM, Justin Karneges wrote: > Hi folks, > > I notice in XEP-0060 (as well as XEP-0277 and other places) that when Atom is > used with pubsub, the internal id of the entry never matches the id of the > item that contains it. > > Is there a reason to do this on purpose? The main reason I can think of is > if > you didn't trust the Atom ids to be unique, for example when aggregating. > However, this mismatching complicates other use cases, like if you want to > update an existing entry. You'd need to use the pubsub id and not the Atom > id. > > Maybe I miss the point, but I think XEP-0277 should require item ids and atom > ids to match, unless someone can explain why this is not a good idea. > > Thanks, > Justin >
I think so too. And I think that pubsub should have a possibility to track changes of items. -- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
