On 6/30/11 1:28 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > Am 18.05.2011 18:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: >> On 5/18/11 12:58 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: >>>> Version 0.10 of XEP-0220 (Server Dialback) has been released. >>> >>> For the record: >>> I disapprove this version because it still contains "serious bugs" >>> (example 7) >> >> You are right that example 7 has a copy and paste error... > > So serious bugs degrade to "copy and paste error" when you no longer > need them to support your argument for a rewrite? Interesting.
It was a copy-and-paste error. It happens to have been a somewhat serious copy-and-paste error, but that's what it was. You can spin it however you like, but I must say that I really don't appreciate your snarky tone. > You have also introduced yet another copy and paste mistake in the most > recent version: > > Example 18. Stream Features With <errors/> Element > > does not show the <errors/> any more and additionally > > <stream:features> > <dialback xmlns='urn:xmpp:features:dialback:1'> > </stream:features> > is not valid xml. Fixed in 0.11. > And sorry for using this bad word again, but isn't it ridiculous to > publish a new version with a debatable change and then not to do > anything for weeks? Working 80 hours a week will do that to a person. I'm sure you understand. > What would have happened if anyone actually implemented this would-be > way of advertising support for dialback errors? It's an experimental spec. Anyone following the list would know that it's provisional, especially given all the discussion on this particular point in the text. Anyone not following the list is not being very smart about how they implement XMPP. > Are you waiting for someone to implement your version so you can claim > "running code"? See above regarding snarkiness. You might want to familiarize yourself with Hanlon's Razor. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
