Le Jeudi 18 Août 2011 20:40:05, Sergey Dobrov a écrit : > > It's a bad idea to append the number to the namespace since it reserved > for different revisions of XEP and not for your purpose. Again, I think > that this should be solved by some privacy lists extension since your > decision again restricted.
As I said before, it just a Q&D hack for testing purpose, I know it's not a good solution. I would rather use privacy lists or whatever if we could have a per-item access management with it. > > > If I have to poll this by myself at client side, I'll have to send X IQ > > stanza for my X contacts, and flood the server. > > Client should cache data. You will flood anyway the only difference is > who will flood: client or server. In all cases the client will need the data, and it's better to send one request to server, that X request for X contacts. Actually I think about something similar to Extended Stanza Adressing (http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0033.html), but to get several pubsub nodes at once. > > I ask last items presence to not have to poll individually all my > > contacts roster. On some blue centralised services, it's common to have > > 100+ contacts, should I poll all of them each time I log-in ? > > No, Pubsub node can send you an event when you came online with the > serial for it's journal so you can decide to ask the node for new items. Oki, that looks like a nice solution, once again, waiting an answer from pubsub people.
