On 10/5/11 10:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 10/5/11 9:07 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 10/5/11 1:20 AM, Gerard Maas wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Thanks for the follow-up. >>> >>> Could you give me an idea about the timeline of such a revision? Are we >>> talking days/weeks/months? >> >> Hours? :) >> >> The XMPP Council will discuss the matter in its meeting today, which >> just started. > > See here: > > http://xmpp.org:5290/muc_log/muc.xmpp.org/council/111005/#15:32:53 > > and here: > > http://xmpp.org:5290/muc_log/muc.xmpp.org/council/111005/#15:46:16 > > SleekXMPP appears to have <Base64> but in the chatroom Lance Stout said > he could fix that. > > I am inclined to view <Base64> as a typo in the (unofficial) schema that > we borrowed from Elliotte Rusty Harold's book, and inclined to correct > the schema with a prominent note in the text about earlier versions of > the spec showing <Base64> instead of <base64>.
I've provisionally updated the spec: http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0009-2.2.html http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0009/diff/2.1/vs/2.2rc1 I expect that the XMPP Council will consider these changes at its next meeting. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
