On 28 December 2011 10:33, Sergey Dobrov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/27/2011 01:12 AM, Tuomas Koski wrote: >
>> On 22 December 2011 12:38, Sergey Dobrov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ok, sorry for wasting your time, i am closing the project. >> >> Never give up, never surrender! :-) > > I thinking now about forget about XSF and use patched module for my app. > Anyway, if I will do any other solution, it will be not standardized. > So, why to reinvent a bicycle if no pros found? > Completely "forgetting" the XSF wouldn't be wise or constructive, in my opinion. The XSF: 1) Does not claim to have published a protocol for every possible application 2) Does not force you to use only its published protocols 3) Is a community of people, and one open to contributions Therefore, if you really believe there is a space for a "different PEP" then you are welcome to implement it, and submit your protocol as a XEP. As long as it's basically sane it'll be accepted and published as an experimental XEP. Useful links: - http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0143.html - http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html Regards, Matthew
