> The question is: What to mention in XEP-0301? > Most of these are not spec-related issues...
Yes that is the topic at hand, isn't it? I would say that, if anything, adding an implementation note that it is acceptable to include a <thread /> in a RTT update, and that it may be used to differentiate sessions in conjunction with full JIDs would be sufficient. I also see now that XEP-0301 6.4.3 touches on the MUC issue, using the error recovery you described. The simultaneous login scenario in 6.4.3.2 sounds like differentiating between full JIDs, and not the multiple nick session scenario. If this situation warrants mention in the spec, then a sentence indicating that the multiple nick session scenario is also covered by 6.4.3 would be appropriate. -- Lance
