> I think it's worth including the id on every RTT edit, > rather than just the first - it makes the state machine easier for the > receiving clients and doesn't hurt the sending client.
+1 on this. Even though the use of the seq value and error detection can be used to ensure that the RTT update is still within the context of editing a previous message, keeping that context explicit is a good thing (and was what my hypothetical version of a XEP-0308 flow was intended to accomplish). With that, I'm strongly in favor of Mark's proposal. It should be a small enough section to fit in fine with XEP-0301, and shouldn't slow down its progress to draft state, which is a consideration given the broader legislative situations. -- Lance
