On 7/19/12 2:19 AM, Lance Stout wrote: >> I think it's worth including the id on every RTT edit, rather than >> just the first - it makes the state machine easier for the >> receiving clients and doesn't hurt the sending client. > > +1 on this. Even though the use of the seq value and error detection > can be used to ensure that the RTT update is still within the context > of editing a previous message, keeping that context explicit is a > good thing (and was what my hypothetical version of a XEP-0308 flow > was intended to accomplish).
+1 here too. /psa
