On 24 July 2012 14:58, Tuomas Koski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 24 July 2012 15:47, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Howdy folks, >>> >>> What is the consensus on how to handle missing fields from a submitted >>> data form? E.g. in the context of MUC configuration. >>> >>> I see three options: >>> >>> 1) Reject the form >>> 2) Keep the current value for missing fields >>> 3) Use the default value for missing fields >> >> (2) seems to be the sensible thing to do. > > +1 for option "2) Keep the current value for missing fields". >
Then it seems to be something we should clarify in XEP-0045 at least. Regards, Matthew
