On 7/24/12 8:35 AM, Matthew Wild wrote: > On 24 July 2012 14:58, Tuomas Koski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 24 July 2012 15:47, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Howdy folks, >>>> >>>> What is the consensus on how to handle missing fields from a submitted >>>> data form? E.g. in the context of MUC configuration. >>>> >>>> I see three options: >>>> >>>> 1) Reject the form >>>> 2) Keep the current value for missing fields >>>> 3) Use the default value for missing fields >>> >>> (2) seems to be the sensible thing to do. >> >> +1 for option "2) Keep the current value for missing fields". >> > > Then it seems to be something we should clarify in XEP-0045 at least.
I've always thought that #2 was the right approach, but I agree that we might not have made that perfectly clear in XEP-0004 and the specs that use data forms. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
