[Standards] Contradiction in XEP-277 (Microblogging over XMPP).

[Marco Cirillo]

There's a "fairly" contradictory text for the open access model in the extension,

Paragraph 4.2 point 3 cites:



While the description for the open access model in XEP-60 cites:




Regards.

<< The "pubsub#access_model" SHOULD be set to "open" to allow any user to comment to a post. Other values are suitable too according to the user's settings. >> << Any entity may subscribe to the node (i.e., without the necessity for subscription approval) and any entity may retrieve items from the node (i.e., without being subscribed); this SHOULD be the default access model for generic pubsub services. >> Which means that everyone can subscribe and retrieve items from the node, but _not_ post to it as 4.2.3 in XEP-277 says.

smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME