Yes, you're right, it needs to be read as pubsub#publish_model, I'll fix it in the next revision of the XEP, thanks for your feedback!
On 07/26/2012 09:53 PM, Marco Cirillo wrote: > There's a "fairly" contradictory text for the open access model in the > extension, > > Paragraph 4.2 point 3 cites: > << The "pubsub#access_model" SHOULD be set to "open" to allow any user > to comment to a post. Other values are suitable too according to the > user's settings. >> > > While the description for the open access model in XEP-60 cites: > << Any entity may subscribe to the node (i.e., without the necessity for > subscription approval) and any entity may retrieve items from the node > (i.e., without being subscribed); this SHOULD be the default access > model for generic pubsub services. >> > > Which means that everyone can subscribe and retrieve items from the > node, but _not_ post to it as 4.2.3 in XEP-277 says. > > Regards. > -- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
