On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Mark Rejhon <[email protected]> wrote: > The recipient-side single JID handling still continue to provide > excellent UX in all situations even in differing behaviours (e.g. > XEP-0296 followed or not, resource locking followed or not, Google > Talk-style server carbons or not, etc.) .... It is thus my opinion > that while senders should still send to full JID and recipients should > still do disco with full JID, the internal storage of real-time > messages can be indexed by bare JID.
OK. I don't feel strongly enough about this to make it worth much more discussion - if anyone else has opinions I suspect they'll share them. /K
