+1 on moving this XEP forward. It has solved several use cases for us already.

-- Lance


On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I'll raise this issue during the XMPP Summit later this week, but I
> think it would be good to bring back (and advance to Draft) the
> Reachability Addresses extension:
> 
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0152.html
> 
> There are several use cases of interest here, especially so-called
> "CUSAX" (combined use of SIP and XMPP) endpoints. In fact the
> reachability extension is mentioned in the relevant Internet-Draft,
> which Emil Ivov, Enrico Marocco, and I are working to move forward at
> the IETF:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax/
> 
> (And if you have feedback on the CUSAX I-D, please do send it along,
> preferably to the [email protected] list.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
> - -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlEGtJkACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxvvACg4ywwXzI41kuWI0qa2i9UoWQb
> 804AmwYcPBQyyydAgjeahbxclo4zAxG8
> =kvEX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to