Ok, because I have some comments on the proto-xep, so I'm waiting for the feedback.
thanks Le mardi 5 mars 2013 16:34:43 Sergey Dobrov a écrit : > On 03/05/2013 04:17 PM, Goffi wrote: > > G'day, > > Hello, > > > I just realised that you answered my question later ! > > > > Any news on that ? Did the initial author finally answered ? > > Where is your rewritten XEP available ? > > Yes, he has answered and I have sent the new version of the XEP to > Peter. We are waiting for his feedback now. > > > Cheers > > Goffi > > > > Le vendredi 7 décembre 2012 17:46:40 Sergey Dobrov a écrit : > >> There was no response to my letter so I rewrote the XEP and have already > >> sent it to Peter as protoXEP. > >> > >> On 11/01/2012 02:49 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote: > >>> On 11/01/2012 02:47 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Sergey Dobrov <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> On 10/31/2012 08:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>>>>> Hash: SHA1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's hard for the XSF to accept a proposal as a XEP if the person who > >>>>>> wrote it never asks us to do so. :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Funny thing :) Thanks Peter. I'll email to the author with the same > >>>>> question > >>>>> then. I don't know if it'd be a crime if someone will submit the XEP > >>>>> instead > >>>>> of the author if he will not respond.. > >>>> > >>>> Given that submission to the XSF involves a transfer of ownership, yes > >>>> - you wouldn't be able to do that. > >>> > >>> I already sent the letter so will hope that the author will respond. > >>> Otherwise, it will be necessary to rewrite the XEP, it seems.. :( > >>> > >>>> /K
