Addendum: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Mark Rejhon <[email protected]> wrote:
> *WORTHY -- BUT POSTPONE TO 2014* > It makes a lot of sense but I'm going to postpone this change for now, > because of unanticipated side effects of minor wording tweaks. > Both me and Chris treat <w> intervals accumulating on a system time since > the beginning of <rtt>, so slow local performance doesn't cause <w> to > Incomplete sentence noticed; completing it as: Both me and Chris treat <w> intervals accumulating on a system time since the beginning of <rtt>, so slow local performance doesn't cause <w> to cause a backlog. Even if it did cause a backlog, handling for backlogged <rtt> (which is the bigger problem and chief cause of lag), that is already written in the spec (with improved wording), can already adequately handle this scenario in XEP-0301 clients that used a "wait since last action element" methodology." In other words, the problem is already indirectly solved by the Version 0.8 of XEP-0301 (existing section 6.5)
