Thanks Lance. Does anyone else have feedback on 152? Is anyone other than Lance using it?
/K On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Lance Stout <[email protected]> wrote: > Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send your > feedback to the [email protected] discussion list: > > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or > to clarify an existing protocol? > > > Yes, there are use cases for this spec, which my company has used this XEP > for already for associating phone and SMS numbers with a JID. > > Additionally, I think this XEP is very helpful for the case of migrating to > a new JID. > > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and > requirements? > > > Yes, the given problem is solved by the XEP. > > 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why > not? > > > Yes, we have already used this in internal systems. If this isn't in > SleekXMPP already, it will be. > > 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? > > > None beyond what is already specified. This type of information would tend > to be available already in other formats. > > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? > > > Yes > > > Your feedback is appreciated! > > > +1 on moving forward >
