-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/22/13 6:30 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > Yes, I think it's a useful thing. And useful to be distinct from > '174, too.
Right, which is why I removed the reference to it in XEP-0174 as a "generalization" -- that was just confusing. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRnL0BAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pNnEP+wYkUNejEXUQTjnmG/9DUUpS sfaV8gbl1EV5+94Iz6c5BTxRedANReXVJPxvuUb44axXSh3XEXm32rbmtzYKKQh+ BUI7pQb3h/NkQq//ffPmS2+DCI8FuQ7Z5yYLCvxIuzQ1dFKKuv6P3uIjTo8fD7QN sKOMd+9JvPcQKusG2ohnnSFomxQh8VX8TwET+xL6vUWcTglvV5Gk05E1L26p5eQc MQr9xtlJW5peN/6llGwpl++nHK0Y6aRjjw8F7HgL31h9PRqEVAFnJoAWtSiPBrS3 e3ulVlELs/Uyo2DsGq/QtpqUiLuXZlj2vdVU9eS4JoQK1+Wi1zzsuNvws4XP8zJp iKNeTw5ZzxBBcj3w1TmVmg6UPH9VomI7jpPOVGBHZZRec1uyBK2BXVU3Yzkrdc/B 0Wu6uijiQ0B00AD3N93RPPxAFm9dToYk8No2rVmDla/BzJMHxvmUSI376Z1sNY+i BV0mYFl7YVhCeanSDITO2FJYYpWJQ66cB7kdBu9Xurttxxc2GoxFTNzgHGhcgBt/ B0BbWb6p7hq1VnQddcpdXRrgjWiR91IEgHe9p+B+3LVaXuwdqnInsCU1Bk4s5Ley QyxdZ432uwdpArw6jiW6mHxgHr5mbDRaPwcBRpz4Wd7X3XRrGcpcabEEU6Q7Z94o AA+HENy73sfqHh/R2XcV =w7LS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
