On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > There are sufficient pre-existing deployed implementation which require you > to join the room first (as far as I'm aware) that the best you can hope for > here is a MAY, or possibly SHOULD (but implementations exist that ...). > An alternative would be to have a disco feature of the MUC service indicate > that joining is not needed for non-occupant actions.
All of these involve changing what is currently specified, which isn't what I'm suggesting - but I'm happy with a note saying "It is known that some existing implementations require you to join the room" along with the note saying that you don't need to. /K
