On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Spencer MacDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > Before I send in my update with the above changes, I am think about adding a > requirement that all messages that can be marked, should have an "allowed" > child element. > > <allowed xmlns='urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0'> > > This means that messages containing only Chat States, Delivery Receipts etc > are not included in Chat Markers and this will network traffic for redundant > Chat Markers. > > Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Sounds reasonable - although I'm not sure 'allowed' represents what you're trying to express (or I didn't understand). Would 'markable' be better? /K
