The revised proposal has been pushed to the inbox: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/chat-markers.html
Peter On 7/9/13 5:07 AM, Spencer MacDonald wrote: > I have updated the XEP based on the feedback. > > Regards > > Spencer > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Spencer MacDonald > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > No your correct, I was trying to stick to the naming from other XEPs > but it doesn't quite fit. > > Regards > > Spencer > > On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:57, Kevin Smith wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Spencer MacDonald >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Before I send in my update with the above changes, I am think >>> about adding a >>> requirement that all messages that can be marked, should have an >>> "allowed" >>> child element. >>> >>> <allowed xmlns='urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0'> >>> >>> This means that messages containing only Chat States, Delivery >>> Receipts etc >>> are not included in Chat Markers and this will network traffic >>> for redundant >>> Chat Markers. >>> >>> Does anyone have an opinion on this? >> >> Sounds reasonable - although I'm not sure 'allowed' represents what >> you're trying to express (or I didn't understand). Would 'markable' be >> better? >> >> /K > > -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
